More Obamacare Fallout

Remember the line, "you will get to keep your doctors?" Well, we just lost another one. We have Tricare Prime. My 12 year old son has migraines and is ADHD. He's on Intunive and Concerta. His neurologist wanted him on an ADHD med that didn't have a stimulant, so he lowered the Concerta dose and added Intunive. His pediatrician handles the concerta script, while he does the Intunive. I called to refill the Intunive (which had several refills left) and was told they couldn't refill it. They told us to contact our doctor. Well, I've lost the business card, so I went to the website to find it. First of all they've changed all the categories and no longer have Child Neurologist. I had to look under Nervous System Disorders. I found my neurologist (who only does adults) but could not find his. I've lost another doctor.

I had to call his pediatrician to see if they can mail me a prescription for Intunive while I search for another child neurologist that takes my insurance. And I have GOVERNMENT INSURANCE. I tried to warn everyone about this 2 years ago, and no one would listen.

We have got to get Obamacare repealed. The insurance companies are deserting Medicaide and Tricare Prime like rats leaving a sinking ship. The government doesn't reimburse in a timely manner, nor very much. They're losing money. I had written an article a few years back when I went through all my receipts and discovered that they reimburse at about 19%. What if I owed the government taxes after I filed and decided to only send them 19% of what I owed? Do you think I could get away with it? If they are trying to force doctors to lower their prices, this is NOT the way to do it. They'll just make it to where doctors will refuse to take Medicaid/Medicare/Tricare. The only reason they currently take Tricare Standard is that the government only pays 80% of WHAT THEY ALLOW on claims. The hospital can come after the patient for the rest. Say you have a doctor's visit that costs $200. The government decides it's only worth $120. So they send the doctor $96 (which is 80%). The doctor will come back and tell you, well, they paid $96, you owe us $104. They won't say, ok, you only owe us $24. Where are they going to get the other $80? They may cost shift it, and charge people with other insurance plans $280 for their visit, but they are not going to lower their price to $120. If they did lower it to $120, the government would decide it would only pay $80, and then send them 80% of that, which is $64. You'd be paying $56 instead of $16.

Do they think no one in America has a calculator? Or is it that they figure they've dumbed down the younger generation of takers enough that they won't notice?

This is outrageous. The Tea Party better get their act together and get behind one candidate.

Taxes and Executive orders

I've been wondering about the report that President Obama wants to list all Farm Equipment as commercial vehicles and anyone who drives it will be required to have a CDL (Commercial Driver's License). I just got an email that lists all the current taxes. Did you know there's a tax on getting a CDL? If this passes, he'll be able to tax the farmers out of one hand, while giving them subsidies out of the other. He is desperate for revenue.

Here's a list of all the taxes (I don't know if this includes ALL taxes or not)

Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
Sales Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax


Some of these I can't comment on because I know nothing about them or don't have a theory. I realize that these have been in effect for a while, and I am not blaming Obama for STARTING the tax, just for exploiting the fact that it's there. I'm so glad we are all waking up, Republicans and Democrats, to what has been taking place in our country over the past 110 years or so.

Corporate Income Tax....he wants to raise the taxes on corporations. I didn't study economics (and I don't play an economist on TV), but someone owns that corporation, right? Don't they already pay taxes on what they themselves make? That would be double taxing someone.

Inheritance tax....couple that with Obamacare and their death panels, and you have people collecting inheritances before they'd planned because the government deems their parents too old to be treated. Taxes gathered in earlier.

IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax).... Can we charge interest on them when they don't pay us in time? How about all the people who get all of their taxes back because they didn't earn enough. Do they get to charge taxes on the fact that the government has earned interest on the money they collected during the year? If they invested that money, they earned interest on it.

Marriage License Tax.....Ever wonder why he's all for gay marriage? More people paying the Marriage License Tax. I'm surprised he doesn't lower the age for marriage so all his Muslim brothers who want to marry 4 women and as young as "in the cradle" will be taxed...oh, wait, Muslims aren't supposed to tax other Muslims or charge them interest.

Medicare Tax....again, couple this with Obamacare. He wanted more people on Medicare. Or, if this means the Medicare taken out of your check, couple it with Amnesty. Get the Illegals actually being paid above the table instead of under the table and you get more taxes. Bet the ones who vote for him won't realize this.

Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax...Does this apply to cell phones? He's trying to get cell phones as a right. They're also giving out free phones (at least one company is, but I forgot their name at the moment). My son who is on SSI (adult handicapped) got a notice that said he could have a free cell phone. I didn't take them up on it because why would I give a phone to a mentally handicapped adult? I guess this is for the people on Disability that aren't really disabled and the welfare recipients.

Utility Taxes....Remember, under his plan, utilities will necessarily sky rocket.

Once again, I'm not blaming Obama for STARTING these taxes, just taking advantage of them. Some have said that he's inept and not very intelligent. I disagree. I believe he knows exactly what he's doing. If you don't believe me, look up the Cloward and Piven strategy. He's following it as best he can. Overwhelm the system, and it will crash. He can then restart it as a communist/Marxist system.

As an update: On April 15th, World Net Daily came out with a story about the tract of land (called the buffer zone) that was transferred to the Obama's wasn't assessed or had taxes paid on it. Here's the link for the article: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=332929

According to Wikipedia (and I don't like to use them because they're very liberal/socialist): A property tax (or millage tax) is an ad valorem tax levy on the value of property that the owner of the property is required to pay to a government in which the property is situated. Multiple jurisdictions may tax the same property.

So, if you don't claim part of your property because it was given at different times, your real estate will be valued below what it actually is worth. Therefore you would pay less taxes. it's like adding square footage to your house and not having it reassessed. With normal average citizens, once they find out, they back charge you. Is Obama, a lawyer, going to say he didn't know?

Obamacare fallout

Well, I've discovered another consequence of Obamacare. I just went to get eye exams for me and my youngest son (actually back in July). The last time I got an eye exam, which was about three years ago, I could go anywhere, as long as I filed my own claim. I always went to Walmart. Walmart doesn't take Medicaid, which my oldest son is on. So I found an eye doctor that takes Medicaid. I thought, since my youngest son and I needed eye exams, we'd use the same place. I know they only pay for one eye exam every two years, which is stupid in and of itself. Every eye doctor I've ever gone to (and I've had glasses for 42 years) tells you to get an eye exam every year.

Well, I went, with my son, and filed the claim. Now, usually Tricare Prime will allow about 80% of what you actually bill, and then pay 80% of that. So you automatically deduct 40% and that's what you can expect to get back. I get the claim form, and they allowed the whole $65, but made it a deductible. So I called to find out what was up. I didn't go to one of their "approved" places. They labeled it a Point of Service, and basically disallowed it. And I bet this other place charges more than $65.

I just called and the place that actually takes Tricare Prime, charges $160 for an eye exam. Well, can you say Cloward and Piven? Let's double the price, and not pay for anyone who goes to a cheaper place. So, with all the financial distress this country is in, if I decide to go to a cheaper place, I have to pay for it myself. And we wonder why this country is in the mess it's in.

In addition to this, I had another claim that I filed. I got lymphadema in both arms from my cancer treatment. I had to buy lymphadema sleeves (compression sleeves). I paid $184 for the two together. They reimbursed me $88 and change. So they normally take off something like 20% and then reimburse you 80% of what they allow. But they will allow the full amount when they don't expect to have to pay it back to you.

Like I said, can you say Cloward and Piven?

African Socialism revisited

Hopefully this will go through. It seems my first attempt to post this must have hit a filter on Google blogs. It didn't post, and now I'll have to try to remember all I said.

I wrote a critique of Barak H. Obama Sr.'s critique of Sessional Paper No. 10 a while back, but with all that's gone on in the last couple of years, I thought I'd revisit it. I've learned a lot about this administration in the past two and a half years. This reveals a lot of their agenda.

I'll put direct quotes from the critique (in Barak H. Obama Sr.'s own words) in quotation marks. I'll then follow up with my critique (these are my opinions).

"If it is accepted that it is the leaders of a country who usually formulate and define ideologies, then the only source for this definition would be to get it from them either through their speeches, press reports or papers or through their actions."

Well, that says a lot. This administration has refused to acknowledge the definition of socialism as defined in the dictionary, and have been trying to redefine it since Obama got elected and accused of being a socialist. They've even gone so far as to have the media label us all socialists. We have to look towards their actions, mostly, since the speech is directed at redefining the term. President Obama nationalized how many companies, I lose count. The banks, the car industry, etc. That's a definition of socialism. President Obama wants to redistribute the wealth. That's a definition of socialism. President Obama wants equality for all, that's socialism. Make everyone the same, no matter the amount of energy they put into bettering themselves. If they don't get high enough on their own, lets take from the rich and give it to them. Doesn't matter that the rich worked to get where they are.

"After all, how can one talk of the independence of something people do not know?"

This applies to why they don't define socialism as well as the reason behind their attacks on the Tea Party. 1. Lets not define socialism, so they won't know we're doing it or how to fight it. 2. If we create confusion on who exactly the Tea Party is, no one will want to join it. If we create a cloud around them, everyone will be against them.

"...differ from scientific socialism unless one takes the statement 'society in turn will reward these efforts' to be different from 'reward to each according to his needs.'"

Well, of course they're different. Who determines ones needs? Capitalism is being rewarded by society. Socialism is collecting all the money and rewarding to their needs. So, if the government determines everyone should have a cell phone, for safety reasons, and you can't afford one, one will be provided for you. I see so many people on welfare with IPhones. My family has to work for a living and we can't afford an IPhone.

..."one cannot say that solutions cannot be the same where causes are different."

This explains why Marxists, Communists, Socialists, Anarchists and Muslims are all working together to destroy America. What do you think will happen, Mr. President when these other groups deem you not of any use any more? The Tea Party doesn't condone violence, but what about these groups you've sided with?

"If left to the individual, consolidation will take a long time to come. We have to look at priorities in terms of what is good for society and on this basis we may find it necessary to force people to do things they would not do otherwise."

He's talking about consolidating land into the public domain. He advocates community ownership instead of individual. Doesn't this would like what they're doing with the farmers? They want all farm equipment listed as commercial vehicles, and everyone who drives them to get a Commercial Driver's License (CDL) and pass the same test as 18-wheeler drivers do.

"If the government should, however, feel that individual ownership is the best policy to take in order to bring development, then it should restrict the size of farms that can be owned by one individual throughout the country and this should apply to every body from the President to the ordinary man."

Well, except for applying to everyone. They don't apply any rule they make for the little man to themselves. But I can foresee this administration making an executive order limiting the size of farms....or just regulate them out of business.

"...so long as we maintain free enterprise one cannot deny that some will accumulate more than others."

Ahh, there's the rub. They don't want free enterprise, or capitalism because it encourage people to accumulate more than the people who would rather sit on the porch and wait for the check from the government.

"If some of these firms were to stop functioning today the country would be at a standstill. Let the government take an active part in these spheres and see to it that the people are actively represented in them."

Let's take over a car company and fire the CEO and put our own guy in. Sound familiar?

"...taxation can be used as a means of forced savings...there is no limit to taxation if the benefits derived from public services by society measure up to the cost in taxation which they have to pay."

"Theoretically, there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100 per cent of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed."

These were a few paragraphs apart, but they state the same thing, so I included them together. This explains his desire to tax the rich more, because he has plans to keep lowering that upper limit until it includes everyone not currently on welfare. If you don't believe me read the health care bill. It raises the level at which people qualify for welfare. I guess I should be happy, because when it finally kicks in, my family will qualify. Look up (if you don't know it already) the Cloward and Piven strategy.

"I do not see why the government cannot tax those who have more and syphon some of these revenues into savings which can e utilized in investment for future development, thereby reducing our reliance on foreign aid."

Hmmm. 'Nuf said.

"There is a statement in the paper about encouraging tourism. it is surprising that the government thinks only about lodges but not about making it cheap so as to include those who are not so rich. At the present time, the cost of living is too high for tourists....there are no price controls so that only the very rich can afford to come to Kenya as tourists."

Lets see, this sounds like forcing the airlines to set low air fares and the hotels to charge less. Probably only in liberal cities, though, because who cares if conservative cities prosper? Look at what they've done to Arizona (sued for trying to keep illegals out because the feds won't) and Texas (disallowing aid for all the fires we've had) and Missouri and other midwest towns affected by the flooding.

In conclusion, you can't really blame President Obama. He cut his teeth on communism/Marxism and the Muslim religion through his mother and dad and step-dad. Possibly he believes that his brand of Marxism/communism/socialism will work when no other one has. This is not the thinking of an American citizen. Most natural born citizens recognize our uniqueness. Heck, even some LEGAL immigrants recognize it better than our President.

Marriage Act

I've often wondered why Obama is against the Marriage Act, listing Marriage as a union between 1 man and 1 woman.

I know a lot of people will disagree, but I believe he is a Muslim. You can twist words all you want, to justify anything. The Muslims are allowed to lie to the infidels. They're even allowed to make up stories to mislead. They aren't concerned with facts. They aren't supposed to charge each other interest, that's why you see all these Sharia compliant banks popping up. But they are instructed to charge high interest to infidels. This is supposed to make them want to convert because it's cheaper. I don't have the time to find these in the Koran, you'll have to do your own search on them.

So, I got to thinking. Muslims actually hate homosexuals. They kill them (wake up liberals who are gay and supporting Obama and Shari'a law). So why would he be in support of this? It seems to be against the Muslim belief, and you would think the Muslim community would be all up in arms about it.

But consider this. You've probably all heard the stories about Muslim men coming to America with their 4 allowed wives. They list one as a wife and list the others as extended family and put them all on welfare. If they 1 man 1 woman marriage law was repealed, what would stop it from becoming 1 man, 4 women? It's not about gay rights, they're just useful idiots. It's about getting Shari'a law into the United States. It's the camel's nose under the tent.