This is extremely disturbing to me. I said it at least 6 months ago and was labeled a conspiracy theorist. I was told I was believing unsubstantiated crap off the Internet and subscribing to conspiracy theories. Well, now it's being written of in ArmyTimes. (http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/09/army_homeland_090708w/) Is that proof enough?
Our troops are being trained for combating civil unrest. I've been to a tea party. There was no civil unrest. Do they know something I don't know? Is this civil unrest coming from Obama's men? It sure isn't coming from the right. Is Obama's men going to instigate it?
They have pulled 3rd Infantry's Brigade Combat Team home to train for a new mission.
"In the meantime, they’ll learn new skills, use some of the ones they acquired in the war zone and more than likely will not be shot at while doing any of it.
"They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control or to deal with potentially horrific scenarios such as massive poisoning and chaos in response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive, or CBRNE, attack.
Training for homeland scenarios has already begun at Fort Stewart and includes specialty tasks such as knowing how to use the “jaws of life” to extract a person from a mangled vehicle; extra medical training for a CBRNE incident; and working with U.S. Forestry Service experts on how to go in with chainsaws and cut and clear trees to clear a road or area."
Are they expecting survivalists to hole up in the forests? Are Obama's men going to poison us? Are they expecting a terrorist attack on us? Are they going to use nuclear weapons on Americans? Or is this an Alynsky tactic to get a threat out that is just an empty threat to keep us in line...just threaten, and we'll have to follow through? Just like when they leaked that they were going to storm the subway line with homeless people and fill up all the toilets so no one could use them when some dignatary was due in in New York City so they cancelled. They know that middle America is pissed at them, and we're armed. They know that what they are doing is unconstitutional, and that they are in the wrong. They know that they are cramming things down our throats and they are pushing us beyond our limits and that when they were pushed beyond their limits, they exploded. But, let me ask this question: How were they pushed? What was it they wanted in their day? How many people did they have on their side and what changes did they want? How did they go about getting their change?
Back in the 60's and 70's when the radicals were trying to change our government into what they wanted, how did they go about it and what was their support? I've read Michelle Robinson Obama's College Thesis. She compared Black college students entering Princeton to those leaving and how they wanted to help the poor black society. She concluded that those who had a lot of exposure to white society while in college left not wanting to help the poor black society as much, and began identifying with the whites more, and the poor blacks less. They became integrationists, instead of separationists. My theory is that the two are related. She cited a Black Power book as her research book.
These radicals didn't just want equality of the races. They wanted dominance. This is "some have been in power long enough and it's time for them to step down and let someone else have a time in power" philosophy. She thought Princeton should have been pumping out socialists and instead they left integrated. They felt a bond with the white students because they realized they weren't as racist as they were lead to believe. Whoa, we can't have that. That's why this administration wants free college to people who can't afford it and aren't qualified for it. That's why they are yelling that the tea party movement is racist. They have to foster racism to cover the fact that they are so racist. They have to get the races separate.
What form of government did they want in the 60's and 70's? They wanted Marxism and Socialism; the same thing they want now. We fought it then, and we're fighting it now. The only difference is that it was the hippy fringe trying to get the government to change back then, and now it's the government telling us we're the fringe. I considered myself a bit of a radical back then. But to me a radical meant I didn't listen to my parents. It didn't mean I wanted to overthrow my government.
The Tea Party movement doesn't want to OVERTHROW the government. It wants to shrink the CURRENT government back down to the lap dog we had, instead of the pit bull it has become. The dog we have is about to break it's leash and we don't like that. We want to either take it back to the pound and trade it in, or take it to the Vet and neuter it. We don't want to kill it and buy a cat.
Back in the 60's and 70's, how many were with their movement? A fringe. That's why it was put down so easily. How many are with our movement? I think they said it was something like 70% are dissatisfied with Washington, according to a CBS poll (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-6199132-503544.html). Even the Washington Post, a liberal Medium, listed it at 2/3 dissatisfied or downright angry (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/10/AR2010021004708.html). That's not fringe. Fringe is 20%. Is the left angry because they couldn't get those numbers behind them in the 60's and 70's? Maybe it's because they wanted to get rid of the constitution and we want to go BACK to it?
Like I said in the beginning of this blog....the Army is gearing up for civil unrest. But I don't really think they'll need it from our side. Will they need it from the left? We may have instigators infiltrate our movement. But you know what? We've taken care of that peacefully, so they still aren't needed. Have you seen how we take care of that? We made signs that read Leftist Infiltrator, with an arrow. We point out the infiltrator at our rallies. We run them out peaceably. In a society of U-tube....he's on the air and gets the recognition he so desperately wants. Every one knows he's from the left and not the tea party movement. You're not fooling anyone. You can't keep up the disguise very long. We have all nationalities within our movement. This is not about race. This is about America, the melting pot. We welcome diversity, when you come here legally. How sad is it that you want to separate the races again? Throw us back to BEFORE Martin Luther King, Jr.? He'd be rolling over in his grave. Or he'd be proud of the tea party movement....peaceably promoting the advancement of equality.
But I have news for you, President Obama: You need to check out Oath Keeper's site. We have lots (don't know the numbers) of people in this nation who are refusing such orders. They are veterans, Police officers, active duty military and civilians who are taking an oath to not fire on civilians for one thing. Any President of the United States who tramples on the Constitution is not my Commander in Chief, no matter where he was born. Any President of the United States who wishes to turn this Republic into a Marxist country, is not my Commander in Chief.
And to those who would say, where were you when President Bush was spending us into oblivion, I'll say this: Why weren't you screaming from the ramparts and talking facts and not opinion? Why were you only hanging the man in effigy? Why did you only spit epitaphs at the man? Why did you only incite riots? Where were your facts? Why is it that we can come up with so many facts? And where are you now that Obama is doing it worse? Just because it's your man, you have to abandon principle? I've come to see that Bush wasn't everything I thought he was, and have admitted that I was a Yellow Dog Republican. Do you have the guts to do the same? Let's drop the party lines and get together to save our Republic! The R and the D is supposed to be minor differences like pro-choice and pro-life, or one side wants to have more entitlements than the other side. NOT one side wants the constitution and the other side wants Marxism. Did you vote for Marxism? If you did, get behind him and run with it. If you didn't, get with the constitution. But if you wanted Marxism, you better research it and see what you're getting into. It never ends well.
Lori Ann Smith
No comments:
Post a Comment