There's a dirty little secret the Left has tried to keep hidden for centuries. They even rewrite history to keep it hidden. But the problem with rewriting history is that you can't rewrite all of the history books. You miss some. There will be oral history, there will be people who survive and they will write it down. You will miss some books, and they will survive. You might miss a country that you didn't have control over totally, and their books will eventually come out. You see, truth has a way of doing that, coming into the light eventually.
And what is that dirty little secret? The left would have you believe that the only race to ever be held in slavery is the black man. I've found a document, that unlike a lot of the left's documents about our founding father's has a lot of footnotes. The actual website is: http://www.electricscotland.com/history/other/white_slavery.htm
I'm going to summarize it in this blog.
I absolutely love the first paragraph. "A famous history professor stated that history was not a science but a continuing investigation into the past; a person’s conclusion is based on their own bias. This story will offer evidence that the Alba, Scots, Irish and Pics have been the longest race held in slavery. The reader will be responsible for their own bias pertaining to White Slavery."
I have to admit that I do hold a certain bias. I am Irish. I am white. But I also will admit that I understand that the black man has been enslaved. I think all slavery is wrong. There are different kids of slavery, in my opinion. In the past, one was actually sold, and you had to "work off" your payment. I'm sure the owner kept adding to it so the slave never actually had the ability to pay off the debt. Or maybe there were honest ones who allowed it to happen. Now it's a bit different. The government enslaves in a different way. It's called Welfare. Let's raise the tax base so high that you can't pay it, but then we "give" you money to live. You're now indentured to us. You can never work it off, because it costs more to get a job, because then we take away what we're giving you. You can't have both, and you can't pay the taxes without our handout. That's slavery. You see, those on Welfare don't have to pay the taxes, but as soon as they get a job, they do. But the cost of living is such that if they have a job, they can't have the things they are used to having on Welfare. It's a cycle that they aren't willing to break. It takes a level of bravery to break it....are they willing to step out of slavery? Are they willing to break the chains that bind? That slavery knows no race.
But, back to the article. This article tells of Scottish people being sold into slavery. It tells specifically of Jeremiah Howell being a lifetime indentured servant and winning his freedom by fighting in the Revolution.
According to the Egerton manuscript, the enactment of 1652, which is in the British Museum, two or more justices could arrest a vagrant or person who was begging and send them to the colonies as a slave. During the years of 1662-1665, if you made life unpleasant for the upper class, they shipped you to the colonies as slaves. I have to ask the question, what is considered unpleasant? Is it questioning the government? Is it saying I don't want to be taxed? In today's politics, would we have been rounded up and sold into slavery for our "tea parties?"
This article points out incidences of white slavery from as early as the first century BC. Varro, a Roman Philosopher; Julius Cesar; Pope Gregory of the 6th century noted blue eyed, Blondie haired boys in a Roman slave market.
"The eighth to the eleventh centuries proved to be very profitable for Rouen France." They sold Irish and Flemish slaves to Arab nations. The Vikings were a major component of the slave trade. They often called the Scottish Irish, and they took many to Spain, Scandinavia and Russia.
As a personal note, not in the text of this article. If you search the Bible you will find reference of conquering armies always capturing the defeated race and taking captives as slaves. It's been done through out history. So why have we, as a white race, been vilified as the only ones to have ever done it, and only to the black man? Yes, it is uncivilized, and should not be done. So why does our government do it with economics?
I could go on, but you'll have to read the article. I believe that the Left has to paint someone to be the villain in order to push their agenda. They have to point fingers and make someone look more evil than they are. They use people. That's just what they do. It's the useful idiots agenda. They actually are the elite, and if they had their way, they would round up the tea party people and ship them somewhere else, anywhere, because we are making things unpleasant for them. Think about it. The ones who aren't making things unpleasant, the ones enslaved by the tax codes, the entitlements, the left is still using them, so they're the "good guys." They're the useful idiots. What would happen if suddenly they decided that things weren't going well? What would happen if suddenly the useful idiots started making things unpleasant for the Obama administration? Would Obama suddenly start making things not so pleasant for that class of people? Or would they blame everything on the Tea Party? Oh, those Tea Party People, they made me make this legislation. Just remember. It's a Democratic House of Representatives and a Democratic President who can veto anything the Senate puts out. The only thing they don't have any more is a super majority since Brown got elected. They can no longer have that 60/40 in the Senate. They still have a simple majority which passes most normal stuff. And Obama can just sign an Executive Order. He has with everything else. We have to be the bad guys in that scenario, so they have to keep buried that white people were once enslaved as well.
Well, too bad. History can't stay buried too long. The Arabs enslaved white people, and Obama is part Arab...can I get restitution?
Lori Ann Smith
No comments:
Post a Comment