Why Do We Have to Settle?

Why is the question constantly being asked, "Would you vote for (fill in the blank) over Obama?" Come on, get real. I'd vote for my dog over Obama, but why should I have to settle for a RINO when I want a conservative? Why would I want to get to the same place, only slower, when I can turn this country back on the right course, which at this point would be a 180 degree turn? Why is the media deciding who I vote for?

Why is the debate over, is Romney's religion a cult, when they should be talking about his policies as a governor? Such as, he stated he would be pro-abortion (I refuse to call it pro-choice - if it's pro-life, it should be pro-death), he has stated that he's for gun control (which is anti-2nd amendment, he is (whether he admits it or not) pro-Obamacare due to the Romney care he keeps supporting. Why is it that people talk about Perry's choices as governor and not the fact that he's a Methodist? The double standard is striking, even when it comes from the establishment Republicans.

Even Bill Bennett on his radio program asked the question, "Would you vote for Romney over Obama?" Actually, he even asked "Would you vote for Bill Clinton over Obama?" It's a ridiculous question. WE WANT A CONSERVATIVE. Even Mike Gallagher is calling Romney a conservative. HE ISN'T A CONSERVATIVE if he's pro-abortion, anti-2nd amendment and for government run health care. He's just the most conservative out of Massachusetts.

I've even heard it debated that Herman Cain doesn't have any political experience. Guess what? George Washington didn't have any political experience either. I don't want the kind of politician we have now. I want a patriot. No experience in government at this point might be a good thing.

I think the press wants Romney because they know he's Obama light. I don't want Obama light. I think the establishment Republicans don't want to give up their gravy train either. Establishment Republicans are just as much of socialists as the Democrats. There is no difference. That's why Obama got elected, because no one wanted Obama light, with McCain, so they stayed home.

The press is focusing on "anyone is better than Obama, right?" NO, that's not right. I can't believe that the politicians didn't get that with the last election cycle. WE WANT CONSERVATIVE REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS AND THE WHITE HOUSE. I think the press is setting us up so we accept defeat and just vote for who they want us to.

I don't know what we all should do. I know I'll hold my nose and vote for whoever gets the Republican nomination, but it won't change our government if we get Romney or Huntsman. I'm not sure about Ron Paul. I don't mind him, but I hate the Ron Paul zombies that will only support him. Are they going to stay home if he doesn't get the nomination? I guess we just all need to focus the debates on policies and not be distracted by the stuff that the press wants us to focus on. We need to weed through the propaganda on both sides. If someone is only slamming one or more candidate, and not presenting the good AND the bad, it's probably propaganda. There are good and bad with all the candidates. But I have to wonder when the "good" they come up with Romney is that he "looks presidential."